Published authority data.
Normalized Safety Gate, CPSC or comparable official records. The source's publication establishes the record; 4SI does not add unreported facts.
PUBLIC METHOD / VERSION 1.0
The Presence Risk methodology keeps source fact, 4SI inference, event scoring and economic modeling visibly separate. Missing evidence widens uncertainty; it never becomes an invented fact.
Presence Risk is the exposure created when a system accepts a claim about a person, object or agent as sufficient authority for a consequential action without establishing the relevant physical or accountable presence.
A documented chain from digital claim → asserted presence or identity → granted or attempted authority → consequential action → real-world impact or material exposure.
The public library does not treat normalized authority records as if each had a fully researched Claim → Authority → Action → Consequence chain.
Normalized Safety Gate, CPSC or comparable official records. The source's publication establishes the record; 4SI does not add unreported facts.
A curated case where primary evidence supports all analytical stages. Validation is source validation, not independent forensic verification.
A validated incident selected for source quality, explanatory value, domain balance and institutional relevance.
A transparent separation between documented monetary floor and modeled consequence. It is not a documented loss sum.
Evidence Assurance evaluates provenance, directness and traceability. It does not claim absolute truth, independent forensic verification or legal liability; severity remains a separate consequence signal.
Published by the responsible government authority, regulator, court or equivalent accountable institution.
A traceable first-party notice on an official or directly accountable channel; company-supplied facts remain labeled.
Supported by reputable published evidence, but directness or source traceability remains incomplete.
Retained for monitoring and not eligible for Flagship Case use without further validation.
Record scores and index positions use versioned 4SI editorial rules informed by consequence, authority depth, exposure, market action and verification difficulty.
Documented harm, loss, intervention or material exposure.
The depth and reversibility of the permission attached to the claim.
The difficulty of reconnecting the decision to the expected person, object or principal.
Scores and domain positions are not statistically estimated prevalence rates, probabilities, forecasts, compliance ratings or proof that 4SI independently verified the underlying event. Domain coverage is materially unequal.
ECR separates documented monetary impact from modeled exposure. Data coverage and evidence mode are published beside the result; missing inputs widen uncertainty.
Only explicit loss, transfer or physical-damage amounts qualify. Other monetary mentions do not become the floor.
Published units, deaths, injuries, market action, authority depth, sector and geography inform modeling.
Welfare, remediation, disruption and financial-flow evidence is translated into a common USD-equivalent scenario frame.
Observed-led inputs tighten ranges; hybrid and proxy-led cases remain deliberately wide and right-skewed.
Likely related records are grouped and correlated overlap is suppressed before portfolio aggregation.
Per-record ranges are uncertainty scenarios. The published portfolio envelope is not a portfolio-level P10/P50/P90 interval, prediction, valuation, reserve, damages claim or company-specific accounting loss. Calibration coefficients remain protected model IP.
The website serves a fixed, audited snapshot. Collection, model computation and publication remain separate from ordinary page views and filter changes.
Monitor public authority and official disclosure channels outside the website runtime.
Preserve canonical sources and map fields without turning absence into invented facts.
Apply full chain validation only to curated Presence Incidents.
Apply versioned editorial and economic methods before publication.
Serve static files with source facts, inference, limitations and correction paths.
An Exposure is published only when the full inclusion chain is supported by at least two validated signals or a separately reviewed strong primary record. Watching signals never increase confirmed impact.
Digital claim → asserted identity, object, presence or authority → attempted action → real consequence or exposure → missing trust boundary.
Evidence Assurance A–C may support public evidence. D remains outside validated Exposure status and documented economic impact.
Reviewed incidents are grouped by trust boundary, authority type and action. Canonical URL, event fingerprint, organization, date, action and consequence prevent duplication.
New, Accelerating, Persistent, Watching and Cooling follow published time-window rules. Critical always requires documented human approval.
Documented amounts remain separate from scenario ranges. Every modeled range retains incident IDs, assumptions, version, date and uncertainty.
The website serves a static reviewed snapshot. Pipeline runs create versioned JSON before deployment; ordinary visitors never trigger scoring. Source changes and errors follow the published corrections policy.
The public architecture is informed by official guidance while detailed calibration priors and coefficients remain protected model IP.