THE PRESENCE RISK INDEX · LIVE

The world is granting real authority to signals it can no longer trust.

Money moves. Access opens. Products enter critical environments. 4SI reveals where the real person, object or accountable principal behind a digital claim was never established.

See where trust is breaking now ↗Explore validated incidents

86.0Current pressure

+34.0Over twelve-month evidence window

4,512Official evidence records

15Separately validated Presence Incidents

CURRENT EXPOSURE · HIGHEST-PRESSURE DOMAIN

92Object Presence

The record can look right while the physical reality is wrong.

Pressure is highest where a listing, label or record can be accepted while the identity, condition or custody of the physical object remains unresolved.

Open the domain position ↗

STRONGEST RELEVANT VALIDATED SIGNALASSURANCE A · Direct institutional record

False CE markings put unassessed feeding devices into neonatal care

The MHRA secured fraud convictions relating to medical devices supplied with false CE markings; enteral feeding pumps were used in neonatal and special-care baby units without required assessment, clinical evaluation or safety testing.

THE CATEGORY

A risk index for the gap between claim and reality.

Cybersecurity asks whether a system was breached. Identity asks which credential appeared. Presence Risk asks the question immediately before consequence: was the real human, physical object or accountable principal actually connected to the authority being exercised?

01 / HUMAN

Who is acting?

Track where identity evidence is accepted without the expected person remaining present and accountable.

02 / AGENT

Whose authority?

Track where software acts beyond a verifiable principal, purpose or delegated boundary.

03 / OBJECT

What is present?

Track where a record, mark or listing separates from the real product, component or asset.

04 / SYSTEM

What may proceed?

Track where consequential access or control is granted without a trustworthy physical boundary.

INTERACTIVE EXPERIENCE · ILLUSTRATIVE SIMULATION

The operator is authenticated.
But whose authority is acting?

Step through a consequential payment workflow and locate the control gap between a secure account, a credible instruction and the real principal whose authority moves the money.

Run the Authority Test ↗

CLAIMED PRINCIPALCEOINSTRUCTION

VERIFIED OPERATORACCOUNTANTBANK$300,000

THE MISSING BOUNDARY IS NOT ANOTHER LOGIN.

LATEST PRIMARY-SOURCE SIGNALS

The evidence behind
the position.

4,512 official evidence records and 15 separately validated Presence Incidents. These tiers are not treated as equivalent.

Loading current evidence

Explore the evidence library ↗

THE CURRENT POSITION

Twelve months of
evidence-weighted pressure.

Movement represents evidence density, authority depth, consequence and verification difficulty—not incident probability or predicted loss.

01 / INDEX MOVEMENT

From 52.0 to 86.0.

02 / PRESENCE DOMAIN

Where claims detach.

OPERATING PRINCIPLE

When signals become authority,
presence must survive.

Open evidence gives institutions a shared language for the control gap between a digital claim and the real person, object or principal behind it.

See the failure.

Primary evidence makes visible where a claim acquired authority without a trustworthy connection to reality.

Name the boundary.

A common language connects synthetic identity, counterfeit objects and agentic action to one missing control.

Build the layer.

4SI turns verified presence into a usable permit, deny, record or escalation decision at the moment of consequence.

Explore Presence ↗

FROM EVIDENCE TO CONTROL

Bring us the workflow
behind the exposure.

Founding institutions work with 4SI to translate a documented trust gap into a bounded physical authority decision.

Explore the program ↗