Connect the record to the selected physical asset.
The institution defines which product, component, document or sealed unit is expected at a particular checkpoint.
The physical trust layer connecting a real object to the record, custody event or workflow that represents it.
Presence Layer adds an independent checkpoint where substitution, diversion, counterfeiting or custody ambiguity creates material consequence.
The institution defines which product, component, document or sealed unit is expected at a particular checkpoint.
Receipt, release, installation, maintenance, transfer or use can become explicit physical trust boundaries.
The receiving system obtains a narrow verification result without exposing protected physical data or security-sensitive implementation.
The public model makes custody and decision ownership visible while the underlying mechanism remains protected.
Specify what must be verified, where and under which threat model.
Create a governed association between the protected physical asset and its record.
The expected asset is presented at receipt, release, transfer, installation or use.
An authorized point evaluates the defined physical condition.
The institution accepts, holds, escalates or records according to policy.
Presence Layer can take different physical forms while answering the same bounded question: is the expected protected object present at the checkpoint where it matters?


A selected precision part can be checked before assembly, maintenance or quality release—where an equivalent-looking substitute would create downstream risk.


Receipt and handoff can require evidence that the protected unit presented is the unit expected by the custody workflow—not merely a package carrying plausible data.


A physical document can be connected to a selected release, presentation or custody event without pretending that the trust layer alone proves the document’s legal meaning.


A transfer workflow can verify the protected physical unit before custody changes. Temperature history, product quality and regulatory release remain governed by their dedicated evidence systems.


Maintenance, replacement and controlled-use workflows can require the expected protected component before the surrounding system permits the next governed step.
All names, brands and products shown are fictional concept studies created solely to illustrate possible Presence Layer integrations. They do not represent customers, partners, certified products, production hardware or announced deployments.
Presence Layer supports a defined physical verification question. It does not independently prove origin, quality, safety, ownership, regulatory compliance or an unbroken historical chain unless those claims are established by the surrounding institutional system.
Whether the expected protected physical object is present at the defined checkpoint.
Which provenance evidence is accepted, who may transfer custody, what quality criteria apply and which action follows.
Construction, enrollment architecture, matching implementation, scanner characteristics, performance and adversarial validation.
Presence Layer can deliver a bounded result to Presence Home or directly to existing supply-chain, asset, quality, maintenance and mission systems.
The objective is a bounded verification event that strengthens current systems—not another isolated record of truth.
Receipt, release, transfer and traceability workflows.
Installation, maintenance, inspection and retirement.
Approved inputs, exception handling and controlled release.
Materiel custody, handoff and use under defined policy.
4SI works with selected institutions to map the physical boundary, custody model, integration path and explicit limits before deployment.