Authority map
The action, owner, physical claim and failure consequence.

Evidence & deployment
Begin with the authority boundary, not the device. Test one consequential workflow under explicit operating limits.
Deployment standard
Evaluation separates current capability, active validation and long-horizon direction. No institution should have to infer product status from ambition.
Controlled path
Each step produces an artifact that can be reviewed before additional commitment is made.
Name the person, object or authority claim, the consequential action, accountable owner and current failure path.
Agree on threat model, success criteria, exception path, data limits and stop conditions before testing.
Test the verification moment in a bounded environment with retained evidence and responsible oversight.
Compare observed outcomes against agreed criteria and document the institutional decision.
Evaluation output
A credible evaluation makes authority, limitations and unresolved questions visible.
The action, owner, physical claim and failure consequence.
Misuse, substitution, exception and fallback conditions.
What Presence establishes, what the institution decides and what is recorded.
Acceptance criteria, results, failures and unresolved limitations.
A recommendation for deployment, revision or discontinuation.
Enrollment, review, exception, incident and retirement responsibilities.
Product status
Status must remain specific to the proposed workflow and the evidence available at the time of evaluation.
Map the consequential workflow, physical claim and accountable decision.
Physical forms, integration assumptions and evidence models under bounded review.
A common governed environment for verified people, objects and permitted actions.
Founding Institution Program
The program is designed for institutions ready to test one real decision—not to purchase an undefined transformation.